I don't think he's using a WiFi 6 router (those are still extremely expensive, at least the decent ones) but the AX200 (and I assume the brand new AX210) is jus

I don't think he's using a WiFi 6 router (those are still extremely expensive, at least the decent ones) but the AX200 (and I assume the brand new AX210) is just a great chip. I'm using one on my desktop (you can buy it with a PCIe adapter and an external antenna) since I just don't fill like drilling and routing wire all over than old house alongside a crappy Xiaomi router and it's been rock solid for a year and a half. I've got an average ping to the router of ~2ms. >PING 192.168.31.1 (192.168.31.1) 56(84) bytes of data. >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.69 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.16 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.54 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.88 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=4.79 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.10 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2.04 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.76 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=1.91 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.84 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1.64 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=1.71 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=2.54 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.60 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.62 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.31.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1.56 ms AFAIK the spikes are due to Windows' network discovery.