I find this statement interesting. Historically scientists have a reputation for writing relatively poor code. Code that runs really slowly due to things like u

I find this statement interesting. Historically scientists have a reputation for writing relatively poor code. Code that runs really slowly due to things like unintended nested loops, or striding values (x,y vs y,x). And code that doesn't handle non-happy path cases very well. Are you saying that you trust the code more because the domain knowledge make it more likely to get the right answer then? Has general knowledge increased such that scientists' code isn't as painful as it was 20 years ago?