3 ms·
Did you mean to imply that another comment is completely unhelpful, or was it your intention to invoke the Epimenides paradox by writing a comment that claims i
by raganwald 16y ago
Did you mean to imply that another comment is completely unhelpful, or was it your intention to invoke the Epimenides paradox by writing a comment that claims itself to be unhelpful?
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Epimenides_paradox https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Epimenides_pa...
- dtby 16y agoHow clever. The intent was more than apparent.
- raganwald 16y agoPerhaps I've been reading too much Raymond Smullyan, I apologize if it came across as a criticism of your comment. In fact, I thought the ambiguity was clever on your part.
- dtby 16y agoNo worries. I thought the Planet without Laughter was particularly entertaining. It's also amusing in its own way to watch my comments get voted down. I have, undoubtedly played more +EV games versus a casino than anyone on this site. (And, yes, I will bet on that, too!) But some sort of egalitarian sense of correctness has driven the "value" of my comments below yours. I cared enough to make a 2nd (and now third) comment about it, but really, I don't care. So that kinda sucks.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- mitjak 16y agoLaughter? Was this supposed to be a joke?
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- scoot 16y agoOr perhaps closer to the Liar paradox? "This sentence is false": https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Liar_paradox https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Liar_paradox All completely OT of course!