>the dossier was sourced from misinformation spread by a paid Russian agent. You're moving the goalposts. You original said the report itself was "known to hav

>the dossier was sourced from misinformation spread by a paid Russian agent. You're moving the goalposts. You original said the report itself was "known to have been paid for by Russia". It's plainly false that the report was paid for by Russia and your attempt to assert this as an indisputable fact by prefixing it with "known to" makes it doubly disingenuous.