3 ms·

It seems what you consider odd enough to require a citation depends on your political orientation. Citations for the original claim: https://pdfs.semanticschol

It seems what you consider odd enough to require a citation depends on your political orientation. Citations for the original claim: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e3d/640709c889472858054c8fe3df01cca051d8.pdf https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e3d/640709c889472858054c8f... https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/are-children-raised-with-absent-fathers-worse-off/ https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/are-children-raised-with-... https://www.apa.org/topics/single-parent https://www.apa.org/topics/single-parent https://www.bbc.com/news/education-47057787 https://www.bbc.com/news/education-47057787

dfxm12 6y ago
For the record, these citations reference outcomes related to single parent families or two parent families. Also, the Brookings link is an opinion piece. You understand that two-parent families are not exclusively married families, or that it's disingenuous to posit that if a family isn't single parent, it must be a married family, right?
- rbecker 6y ago
  Even the Brookings link cites a few studies, while the rest of this thread's posts offer nothing but hand-wringing and loaded questions. And you're right, the links aren't exclusively about marriage. So if "married" was erased from the original claim, you'd agree with it?