Thanks for the video reference - I'll check that out. > No, actually it's not. Sorry, not sure I follow - which part of my comment were you responding to here

Thanks for the video reference - I'll check that out. > No, actually it's not. Sorry, not sure I follow - which part of my comment were you responding to here? > To me, Professor MV Ramana in the article raises far more valuable concerns/questions Yep - there are some fairly blunt conclusions in a recently co-authored publication[1] of theirs regarding SMR prospects for the UK and elsewhere: "There is every likelihood that, as with the previous nuclear renaissance, SMRs will be still born with few reactors built. This will mean that public money will again have been wasted on nuclear technology, but, as previously, the main cost will be the opportunity costs of the options not pursued and properly funded because resources have been pre-empted by the nuclear sector." One perspective of many, but worth considering. [1] - https://sppga.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/09/sub277-Attachment-2.pdf https://sppga.ubc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2018/09/sub2...