> > security superiority of Linux in contrast to Windows. Perhaps that's an antiquated notion now > This doesn't exists. It does exist, but as mentioned by th

> > security superiority of Linux in contrast to Windows. Perhaps that's an antiquated notion now > This doesn't exists. It does exist, but as mentioned by the parent comment, that security superiority of Linux in contrast to Windows is a reputation it earned in the late 1990s and early 2000s; back then (before Windows XP SP2), Windows was a security disaster. Both Windows and Linux got better at security since then. > Arguably otherwise Windows has better defense because it comes with built-in virus scanner. Back then (before Windows Vista), it didn't. And one could also argue that this might be because Windows needs a virus scanner more than Linux does.