3 ms·
jimmygrapes was referring to the topics discussed, not the identity of the speakers.
by edbob 6y ago
jimmygrapes was referring to the topics discussed, not the identity of the speakers.
- claudiawerner 6y agoAnd I have doubts there too. Wouldn't it make sense, though? The news is not obliged to only cover issues relating to the majority, but society as a whole, and there are more people who are not (white && straight && male) than are. Granted, that's mostly because of the 'male' part. In what category does a discussion on literature or philosophy fit? (white && straight && male) or !(white && straight && male)? How about new Apple devices? Tech jobs? Which subgroups of the population are hardest hit by the pandemic? I have a suspicion that the majority of the content covered on mainstream radio is actually gender, orientation, and race agnostic.