3 ms·
Sometimes it is. Sometimes it's not. It would be wrong to unconditionally assert either way. I did a pure mathematics PhD and was given a general area to look
by quietbritishjim 6y ago
Sometimes it is. Sometimes it's not. It would be wrong to unconditionally assert either way.
I did a pure mathematics PhD and was given a general area to look at and a problem to solve but that was really just a starting point, I had the flexibility to solve something related so long as it was interesting. The papers I published had my sole authorship; not even my supervisor's name was on them (except in the acknowledgements). I spent much of my time, for several years, in a room on my own with nothing more than a pencil and paper (except occasionally a book). All I did was sit there and think hard. It was glorious, and definitely not slave labour.
Postscript: I did not go into academia. The PhD helped me get (and do) my job afterwards, possibly not as much as if I had worked in industry that whole time, but it was a fulfilling life experience.
- ocfnash 6y agoI also did pure mathematics, and this summarises my experiences perfectly.
- raverbashing 6y agoPure mathematics I believe it's a field on its own: for one, you have salaries but no huge costs with equipment/material. The work is also more independent and not connected to anything outside of mathematics in principle (though the work might evolve to something interesting to huge backers, think Number Theory or Control Theory/Finance/etc)