4 ms·
The easiest way I’ve thought of to do this is simply to have companies pay to keep their copyright. And have it scale with time. You get... 20 years? If you wa
by conception 6y ago
The easiest way I’ve thought of to do this is simply to have companies pay to keep their copyright. And have it scale with time.
You get... 20 years? If you want 21, it costs 1,000. If you want year 100, it costs 1,000,000. Some sort of scale to it. If something isn’t worth 1,000, let the public have it. And the older it is, the more you need to justify its value. Disney is the perfect example. They pay some price, maybe 50M/yr to keep their multi billion dollar enterprise afloat seems a good trade off for the public good. I’m sure there are much better numbers but if you aren’t willing to put any skin into owning your copyrights, the public should get them. Having culture as a whole perpetually owned is not healthy.
- webmobdev 6y agoThis is a good idea. How to implement it would be tricky as Disney is just one example of a copyright holder (that does tend to go overboard). What about someone poor who has inherited a copyright to say a musical piece that isn't commercial yet but s/he would like to work on and expand one day? Would this idea impact them negatively?
- conception 6y agoProbably but this seems like the most edge of edge cases. Also if it got popular, the recording would still be copyrighted.