6 ms·
>OpenBSD Don't bother. OpenBSD's performance is atrocious. I hear dragonflyBSD actually has first-class multiprocessor support, and have always wanted to try
by na85 6y ago
>OpenBSD
Don't bother. OpenBSD's performance is atrocious. I hear dragonflyBSD actually has first-class multiprocessor support, and have always wanted to try it out.
- carapace 6y agoSoftware in different security tiers shouldn't be compared on the basis of performance. I don't care if my OS is faster if it's being used to compromise my systems, eh? It's like, if you take the armor off a tank it will go faster, sure, but don't ride it into battle.
- na85 6y agoI don't think the OpenBSD security claim is as great as it sounds. Unless you are only running sshd and pf, you are beyond their "default install" and heavily into packages and ports. Is gnome 3 on OpenBSD significantly more secure than on Linux? I very much doubt it.
- carapace 6y agoI dare you to go ask that on the OpenBSD mailing list. No seriously. I don't know. I'd like to know. We don't have to speculate and bloviate. Go ask them. https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html https://www.openbsd.org/mail.html