We're broaching many new ideas now, many of which I agree with. I agree that employers have an obligation to communicate in crystal clear terms what equity in

We're broaching many new ideas now, many of which I agree with. I agree that employers have an obligation to communicate in crystal clear terms what equity in the company means. I also agree wealth inequality endangers the stability of our society, and some form of wealth re-distribution makes sense. I also agree that worker cooperatives can make sense in some situations, though rarely. I don't agree that employees deserve to be rewarded for their part in building the company above and beyond their cash and equity compensation. > Personally I'd like to see it move towards a point where taking everything just because you can isn't viewed as acceptable. I still am unsure what you're actually proposing we do. I initially thought you were proposing we shame Josh for taking more than he needs. I strongly disagree with this principle for aforementioned reasons. To put it another way, Josh isn't taking "everything just because he can". He's taking what he owns, rightfully deserves, and worked and risked 7 long, hard years for.