3 ms·
> show that their argument belittling the BLM protests was correct. David Shor has not, to my knowledge, ever made an argument belittling the BLM protests. I w
by Lazare 6y ago
> show that their argument belittling the BLM protests was correct.
David Shor has not, to my knowledge, ever made an argument belittling the BLM protests. I welcome any links you have that might demonstrate otherwise.
> how wrong it is to blame the protests for violence often instigated by the police
Neither Shor, nor the researcher he linked, Omar Wasow did this.
> how there is evidence that the protests strongly helped the Democrats.
Neither Shor nor Wasow have, to my knowledge, suggested that the protests were net negatives for Democrats. You have constructed a series of strawmen.
- boomboomsubban 6y ago>You have constructed a series of strawmen. I was responding to a post that said "It’s conventional wisdom now that failure to condemn violent protests earlier cost Democrats votes, including among minority groups." So if Shor's point was not about such topics, it has been subverted to be used about such topics. I'll admit, he does not seem to have belittled the protests directly though. I may have went to far with that one.