4 ms·
There was a much better (based on more rigorous studies) anti-vitamin piece back in 2014 that made the internet rounds and I think Dr. Rhonda Patrick had a grea
by saas_sam 6y ago
There was a much better (based on more rigorous studies) anti-vitamin piece back in 2014 that made the internet rounds and I think Dr. Rhonda Patrick had a great rebuttal of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0u8UdZeOhc&feature=emb_title https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0u8UdZeOhc&feature=emb_titl...
- coldtea 6y agoI don't think a video by a vlogger (even if it's a doctor with a Ph.D) is a proper "rebuttal" of a paper, much less a great one.
- saas_sam 6y agoI don't think a source-less opinion from an anonymous internet commenter (even if it's on Hacker News) is a proper rebuttal of a rebuttal, great or otherwise. Sources are what count. She shares many.
- coldtea 6y ago>I don't think a source-less opinion from an anonymous internet commenter (even if it's on Hacker News) is a proper rebuttal of a rebuttal You need a source attached to agree with an argument that a vlog is not a rebuttal of a paper? >Sources are what count. She shares many. Sources are a dime a dozen. Bad/happy/fradulent papers also have tons of sources, and even peer reviewers don't ever bother to check them...