3 ms·
“The kind of people who answer polls are really weird, and it’s ruining polling.” This is true everywhere. I’ve been involved polling in for a popular AAA game
by DecoPerson 6y ago
“The kind of people who answer polls are really weird, and it’s ruining polling.”
This is true everywhere. I’ve been involved polling in for a popular AAA game, a small retail business, school events, online forums, and more; they all fail to account for the “who chooses to answer” bias (is there a name for this?).
I speculate that the “average 4.7 million viewers“ rating Firefly received when it aired was totally off. The Fox executives (who clearly didn’t care for the show, if you read the full story) used this as ammunition to have it cancelled. (see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_ratings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_ratings for criticisms of the rating system used at the time).
The people who would take the time to answer a poll (or connect a device to their TV for some cash) are a small subset of people who will skew your data in unintuitive ways. If more business people understood this, our world would be a better place.
- euank 6y ago> is there a name for this bias? I think it's response bias. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_bias
- devinplatt 6y agoI think actually op is referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participation_bias https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participation_bias: "Participation bias or non-response bias is a phenomenon in which the results of elections, studies, polls, etc. become non-representative because the participants disproportionately possess certain traits which affect the outcome." Confusing terminology, but I guess "response bias" is about a false response by the participant to a question, and "non-response bias" is about whether the selected participant responded (participated) at all.