>You can't know, because it wasn't actually e2ee, eh You can know that nobody external to Zoom spied on those streams as they were encrypted between client and

>You can't know, because it wasn't actually e2ee, eh You can know that nobody external to Zoom spied on those streams as they were encrypted between client and Zoom servers. The fact that Zoom had access to your stream, in principle, is par for course. >These are hard to quantify but they're not nothing. And they got in trouble. There is the FTC slap and the PR cost associated with the negative publicity. That feels about right for the level of infraction. But when these kinds of articles come out, people are calling for regulatory bodies to 'make examples' of the companies in question. That's not how it works. That's not how it should work.