3 ms·

Another POV: https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/11/06/a-pro-bono-lawyer-for-trump-campaign-shares-what-he-saw-in-pennsylvania/ https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/1

• philjohn 6y ago
  And yet television pictures during the count refute pretty much everything this person is saying - there were poll watchers mere feet away from the people processing the ballots.
• macintux 6y ago
  It’s hard to trust allegations like “our switchboard was hacked”, especially coming from someone who starts out with saying the Dems always cheat. I’d much rather hear concrete allegations with evidence from someone who isn’t a lawyer for the losing party.
  • wavefunction 6y ago
    As well, this media outlet linked in the op is owned by The Heritage Foundation a far-right-wing "think tank". The other pieces of media on the site do not seem to be without a certain political bias.
• ineedasername 6y ago
  The Daily Signal is published by the highly partisan Heritage Foundation and this person's account does not appear to be substantiated by any other evidence. The person who witnessed the events he relayed may be a lawyer, but he is not an election lawyer and also not from PA, so his specific knowledge of their rules and regulations may be lacking. Assuming the person making these claims accurately relayed his observations, what he saw sounds just as likely to be workers setting up & testing the machines for proper functionality. Of course, there's a chance that's not the case, and something else was going on. But lacking evidence to the contrary, this account seems explainable by something other than election fraud.