3 ms·
You forcing your own caveat on what I said before other people get to read it is a good bit different that simply freely speaking, regardless of the fact that y
by betwixthewires 6y ago
You forcing your own caveat on what I said before other people get to read it is a good bit different that simply freely speaking, regardless of the fact that you own the medium.
Either Twitter is a place for us to speak or it is the blog of the moderation team. It cannot be both. If they want to caveat everything everyone says then you're right, the solution is to not use the site, but it isn't because we don't like what they're saying, it is because Twitter is no longer a website designed for people to have discussions with one another, it is a website designed for the owner to control the flow of ideas.
- jmull 6y ago> Either Twitter is a place for us to speak or it is the blog of the moderation team. It cannot be both. That’s your opinion, but not one Twitter shares, apparently. > Twitter is no longer a website designed for people to have discussions with one another It is already not that. It was never that.
- j4kp07 6y agoIf they are running a blog, then this is more evidence that Twitter is acting as a Editor. > It was never [a website designed for people to have discussions with one another]. I'm old enough to remember when Twitter used SMS gateways. Because the idea was to connect multiple people so that they may share ideas and have discussions.