4 ms·
SSD performance with their integrated IO controller might close the gap here, the same way that pretty fast storage on their iPhones makes the lack of RAM there
by whynotminot 6y ago
SSD performance with their integrated IO controller might close the gap here, the same way that pretty fast storage on their iPhones makes the lack of RAM there not so debilitating.
But yeah, agreed that not having a 32GB option is somewhat disappointing.
(sent from my MacBook Pro with 32GB of RAM)
- vmception 6y agommmmm yeah, I will let you all be the guinea pigs here and check back next month. I am very curious about the performance. If the macbook air is editing 6k videos and scrubbing smoothly, I am optimistic.
- whynotminot 6y agoHeh, I have no intention of being in the initial round of beta testing! I explicitly upgraded to an ice lake machine this summer in order to get the best Intel Mac while waiting for the dust to settle. But I do believe the dust will settle, and I'm optimistic about the future of Apple Silicon.
- mehrdada 6y agoWhile a valid workload for a segment, I would be a bit skeptical of generalizing the extraordinary video editing capability to general purpose computing, as those things are facilitated heavily by hardware decoders.
- whynotminot 6y agoAgreed, but they did mention what sounded like impressive code compilation times in the presentation too, which is pretty salient for most of us here. Of course, we'll need to wait for third party verification in the end.
- mehrdada 6y agoTotally--was not diminishing <strike>A14Z</strike>M1 at all--just to moderate expectations from the quite astonishing video editing capability to "measly" ~2x. Even two year old iPad Pro A12X kicks ass on Clang benchmarks (see Geekbench), although I am not sure how sustained the performance is in that thermal envelope.
- vmception 6y agoout of curiosity, were we saying thermal envelope before the Apple presentation today
- mortenjorck 6y agoThis is an interesting line of inquiry. In the gaming console world, a similar principle has been explicitly espoused by Sony in the decision to only go with 16GB of RAM (a smaller factor increase than any previous generation) for the Playstation 5, as the speed of its custom SSD architecture should in theory make that 16GB go a lot further than it would have with a more traditional design.
- wmf 6y agoAnd then PS5 load times are worse than Series X. Whoops.
- whynotminot 6y agoThat's for reasons that I would expect the technical readership of this site to understand. Please take this shallow retort back to Kotaku.
- lfuller 6y agoThat's when playing backwards-compatible games (PS4 games on PS5, and Xbox / 360 / One games on Xbox Series X) as Microsoft spent more time optimizing their console to play old games. PS5 loads next-gen titles significantly faster than the Xbox Series X due to the 2.5x faster SSD.
- ERD0L 6y ago"significantly faster than the Xbox Series X" You have every right to support your Sony stocks, but blatant lies though ?
- JAlexoid 6y agoPS5 shares memory with the GPU, doesn't it? Which is different to just using RAM to load games. I play modern games with RX 5700XT 8GB video card and 8GB RAM machine without issues.... So maybe there's not much need for more memory...
- Analemma_ 6y agoI’ll believe that when I see it. For like ten years now marketing gremlins have been breathlessly saying “these SSDs will be so fast they can replace RAM!” and it’s never even close.
- 00deadbeef 6y agoI don't want my SSD being killed by being used as a swap device, especially as it's not replaceable anymore. My 16GB MBP can write 200-300GB a day if I'm pushing it hard. It doesn't bother me too much because I can just replace it with a bog standard NVMe drive. But if I'm going to buy a new Mac, I want lots of RAM.