3 ms·
It's not that they weren't able to. It's that the 800k isn't worth the legal fees and the possible PR damage (Bessemer doesn't want to be known as non-founder f
by nemothekid 6y ago
It's not that they weren't able to. It's that the 800k isn't worth the legal fees and the possible PR damage (Bessemer doesn't want to be known as non-founder friendly because they made a fuss over 800k).
It's been repeated a couple times in this thread, but VC make money by 10x-100x their original investment. They invested 800k expecting to make back 8M-80M. Anything less than that isn't worth the additional time, especially for a seed stage investment where they might have 50-60 of these per year.
I think, for anyone trying to start a company and take VC funding to understand how the VC business model works. A VC incentives are much different than a founder's much of the time. In this case, the best case for the VC is for the founder to continue working on the company.
- jariel 6y agoIt is absolutely not 'non founder friendly' for a VC to go after their 'participating' value especially when there is actually money on the table. There would be zero negative PR fallout from that. This founder basically ripped off his investors, it's completely unethical - and he'll never get a dime of VC money again. If VC firms didn't care about getting their 1x money out then the terms wouldn't be there in the first place. It's normal to do that, and a $500M firm returning 10% a year takes 20% of that, so 2% which is not really a huge amount of money for a team of people.