I’m not arguing one way or another, just stating what is going on. It’s amazing how much heat I’ve been getting for sharing the news. The issue is the PA house

I’m not arguing one way or another, just stating what is going on. It’s amazing how much heat I’ve been getting for sharing the news. The issue is the PA house didn’t break any laws with their voting laws. The PA Supreme Court did however change the intent of a law. Again, not arguing. Before the election the Supreme Court Requested separating the ballots so they could later reverse if necessary. They were split 4-4 on the issue last time, presumably it could be 5-4 this time. Hence betting markets are still up in the air. Regarding “convincing” the Michigan data. point is it doesn’t need to be convincing to overturn an election, but should be reviewed. And it likely will.