> It’s mathematically better, I think that armed populace has a higher chance of revolt US is the only country in the western World who only made one real revo

> It’s mathematically better, I think that armed populace has a higher chance of revolt US is the only country in the western World who only made one real revolution. And it was to not pay taxes, not against a true tyrant. > And I also think the reasoning is that the anti-tyrannical populace will be much larger The only thing that will be larger is the anti everybody else populace (tribalism, to give it a name). USA had one major civil war and they keep killing each other like nowhere else in the World (like ten times more than the west average). It's mathematically provable.