4 ms·
How much actual reputational damage could they have possibly endured? I haven't noticed any fewer people using Zoom. It's a consent order. They're willingly ag
by jfrunyon 6y ago
How much actual reputational damage could they have possibly endured? I haven't noticed any fewer people using Zoom.
It's a consent order. They're willingly agreeing to it in order to avoid other costs (like fines and a lengthy trial). There's no "forced to" involved.
- _-___________-_ 6y ago> I haven't noticed any fewer people using Zoom. I think this probably varies a lot between social groups; I know of many people (including non-technical) who were motivated to explore alternatives after reading news articles about Zoom's behaviour. A bunch of non-technical friends subsequently started to use meet.jit.si for meeting up, playing board games, etc, for example.
- gravitas 6y agoZoom's revenue is in corporate accounts, just like Slack - my 10k ppl company uses branded enterprise accounts on both systems, we even have VOIP via them with DIDs. Companies of size do not pivot quickly on telecom and messaging system changes, it takes a lot more than a single issue or two for our money to not be in their pockets.