> isolating the effect of letting the chickens run around true but irrelevant. What you said earlier was about 'pasture raised'... > factory-farmed meat being

> isolating the effect of letting the chickens run around true but irrelevant. What you said earlier was about 'pasture raised'... > factory-farmed meat being less nutritionally dense than pasture-raised meat but they got the same nutrition because they were fed the same factory diet, free-range or not. So totally irrelevant. > and you are refuting with zero evidence No, you are claiming with zero evidence. I am asking for evidence, and then point out your one piece of subsequently cited 'evidence' wasn't. Your next cite is pretty ambiguous too - you previously: "and poor diet makes most factory-farmed meat less nutritionally dense than the pasture-raised", your cited study: > It is also noted that grain-fed beef consumers may achieve similar intakes of both n-3 and CLA through the consumption of higher fat grain-fed portions So in that respect the same. Looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutathione https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutathione for example says "Systemic bioavailability of orally consumed glutathione is poor because..." so that don't help, and I can't see any evidence for or against that glutathione (or the other antioxidant) survives cooking. Your posting unsubstantiated stuff is no more than an extension of ant-vaxxer's thinking, "this is fluffy and nice so it must be right". Reality matters. What you want to believe doesn't.