Probably flagged before the amendment of the article which, while debunking one claim of possible fraud, actually confirms another (possible) case, which gives

Probably flagged before the amendment of the article which, while debunking one claim of possible fraud, actually confirms another (possible) case, which gives it the "political balance" that might have stilled the flaggers had this been reflected in the title: "Investigating election fraud claims using open data and Dolt". Regardless, the article details an interesting use case for Dolt (the first I ever heard of it, but looks on the surface like a great idea).