3 ms·
Why? What you claim is familiar is "bad" right?
by NewOrderNow 6y ago
Why? What you claim is familiar is "bad" right?
- therealx 6y agoThe only "bad" burger to the op is the traditional definition that includes meat. Burger as a concept of two-breads, some toppings, and a patty (arguibly a melt?) is fine.
- crooked-v 6y agoVegans object to eating animal products, not to eating things that happen to resemble animal products.
- NewOrderNow 6y agoYou just repeated yourself. So I ask again why when you claim that this is something you think is bad. By conception, you want something that is not what you claim to desire. It is engineered and the opposite of natural by design.
- detaro 6y agoWhere do they claim that they think it is bad?
- crooked-v 6y agoFirst, I'm not a vegan. Second, vegans avoid animal products because they come from animals. Various imitation and substitute products do not come from animals and so are not avoided. Or, tl;dr: You do realize soy milk is very popular among vegans, right?
- NewOrderNow 6y agoApologies, I failed to communicate my point correctly. What I am trying to say is that vegans are trying to engineer a product. So this product the opposite of natural, so what is with the claims of health? I don't know why I used the word "bad" I find it frustrating as a person who only eats meat and vegetables to have to tolerate vegans who claim health benefits. Most vegans I've met are fat.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- NewOrderNow 6y agoAh no comment as usual from people who claim to want understanding.