3 ms·
This tosses in a whole other layer of stress and meta-game managing the relationship with the teacher. I do not do anywhere close to my best work with someone
by progman32 6y ago
This tosses in a whole other layer of stress and meta-game managing the relationship with the teacher.
I do not do anywhere close to my best work with someone staring at my every move.
For undergrad, I'm much more in favor of deliverable-based approaches. Term projects, problem sets, etc. I think it's cruel to boil such a high-stakes decision to a single-point-of-failure event like a big test. I've heard too many stories where someone had a bad event happen before a test, or just slept poorly, or made a trivial mistake, or got sick, only to be told "too bad".
If cheating is a huge problem, locking down the final step isn't going to fix anything in the long run. It destroys all trust. We need to take a look at the motivations to cheat, even if these reasons are uncomfortable.
- ntsplnkv2 6y ago> I do not do anywhere close to my best work with someone staring at my every move. And some people thrive with others around. Eventually you'll find an excuse for why anything is unfair..."too much pressure!" "not enough time!" And we wonder why, by and large, college degrees become more worthless, and academic vigor sinks like a stone. Maybe we should just accept that college should be hard, that tests should be challenging, and instead, remove the extra requirement for college for most people. Because if we just make it a joke it's pointless anyway.