> No need to be rude. I wasn't. But I was sarcastic and facetious. There's a difference. > I'm just trying to understand the limitations of the protocol. It

> No need to be rude. I wasn't. But I was sarcastic and facetious. There's a difference. > I'm just trying to understand the limitations of the protocol. It did not read like that in the slightest. It read like someone who wants to hit everything that looks like a nail with the end to end encryption hammer. > A group of us are actually building this ourselves. See https://book.peergos.org https://book.peergos.org or https://github.com/peergos/peergos https://github.com/peergos/peergos Great! All the best with that. > The key phrase relevant to this discussion is "trust-free servers". Not with the solid standard it isn't. That's a completely different use case/problem that you're talking about. Solid is attempting to solve the "all of my data is stored, pretty poorly, by thousands of different companies in hundreds of different ways, and I don't have any control over it" problem. It's about data ownership, not server trust.