I admit I find it hard to understand what is a basic human right. I think probably because it's a PR term where the implementation can't match the description.

I admit I find it hard to understand what is a basic human right. I think probably because it's a PR term where the implementation can't match the description. > You have no right to food for free. If it's a basic human right then I think you do. > You don’t have a right to my food. This I also think is true so you hit a contradiction. In practice it's making sure people have enough to eat the best you can. The practical application of what I think you want is freedom of speech and low censorship. But it will include falsehoods. It also avoids the discussion of what is truth, which is impossible.