4 ms·
Last Alioth results I saw LuaJIT was slower than Java, and certainly not in the C ballpark at all.
by swannodette 16y ago
Last Alioth results I saw LuaJIT was slower than Java, and certainly not in the C ballpark at all.
- kragen 16y agohttp://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-10/msg01098.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-10/msg01098.html shows LuaJIT beating GCC 4.3.2 on some parts of SciMark, and no more than 3× worse on any part. I'm importing the shootout CVS repository into Git, so hopefully we can make some more definitive comparisons soon.
- swannodette 16y agoThose overall results show that LuaJIT doesn't really compete much the JVM running under server mode.
- kragen 16y agoOn the contrary, although the JVM is always faster, LuaJIT is within about 15% of it on SOR, and never worse by even a factor of 2.
- mikemike 16y agoThat post is ancient ... here are newer SciMark results for LuaJIT: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2010-12/msg00924.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2010-12/msg00924.html
- kragen 16y agoThank you very much! Looks like LuaJIT's beating GCC on almost everything now, and the JVM on most things. But that's with LuaJIT-specialized code that won't run on Lua, which is a little less exciting.