4 ms·
20k in WI, 45k in PA.....let's call the baseline as a swing of 20,000 votes in a single state. That would be 7-20x the impact of election fraud from the Patter
by CapricornNoble 6y ago
20k in WI, 45k in PA.....let's call the baseline as a swing of 20,000 votes in a single state.
That would be 7-20x the impact of election fraud from the Patterson, NJ election case this year (estimates range from 1,000 to 3,000 votes affected). [1] There were four men charged in that incident. [2] So with about 30-100 personnel with malicious intent, distributed across a dozen election districts, you could theoretically swing an entire state's results in the 5-figure ballot range.
While this is not PROBABLE, we should acknowledge that it is POSSIBLE, and take steps to mitigate the risk accordingly. But basic enforcement of election integrity just outright sucks. Why else would someone feel so bold as to video themselves ballot harvesting and thinking it's ok?[3]
[1]https://newjerseyglobe.com/local/evidence-of-massive-voter-fraud-in-paterson-election-court-records-show/ https://newjerseyglobe.com/local/evidence-of-massive-voter-f...
[2]https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/paterson-press/2020/06/25/paterson-nj-election-fraud-who-charged-and-what-we-know/3260250001/ https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/paterson-press/2020/0...
[3]https://www.twincities.com/2020/09/28/project-veritas-video-alleges-widespread-voter-fraud-in-mn-with-u-s-rep-ilhan-omar-at-head/ https://www.twincities.com/2020/09/28/project-veritas-video-...