3 ms·

Because I want to give my software away to individuals and small companies, but if someone gets big enough that they can afford to pay, I want them to pay me th

• prepend 6y ago
  That makes sense. What I mean is that you can do that. Set up a license so rich people can’t use it. What I meant is that releasing software under a license that doesn’t reflect what I want and the complaining will just lead to frustration. This seems like a simple problem to solve, just release under whatever license I want. This faker.js project is released under MIT. The author can continue development under some non-OSS license and I think that will make him happier because rich people would stop using it. But I don’t think it will make him the income he wants. I think the problem is that non-OSS licenses will result in people just not using the project, not that rich people will start shelling out. As a small business, I would avoid these licenses as well because having multiple licenses kick in at different levels will be confusing and expensive. I’d rather use OSS or just buy commercial products.
  • StavrosK 6y ago
    Oh, agreed. I'm more lamenting the fact that there's no good license for this (that I'm aware of, anyway). > As a small business, I would avoid these licenses as well because having multiple licenses kick in at different levels will be confusing and expensive. I’d rather use OSS or just buy commercial products. You could just license it from the start and not have to worry about the license kicking in, though.