4 ms·
That's not correct, those are not considered OSS. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Defini
by ricardobeat 6y ago
That's not correct, those are not considered OSS.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Open_Source_Definition
- andi999 6y agoI am not really happy that a string of words which have an understandable meaning ('open' and 'source' leading to 'open source') has been hijacked by some foundation. I mean how would you phrase it if your customer wants to source to be open, but without the freedom of redistribution (because he doesnt want to pay for it).
- erinnh 6y agoIt wasnt hijacked, it was invented by them. Source available is very much a widely accepted moniker for what you describe.