3 ms·
You might honestly be right, for anyone who expects to buy five albums a year. The downside being that all the music you've "bought" might just disappear if the
by neltnerb 6y ago
You might honestly be right, for anyone who expects to buy five albums a year. The downside being that all the music you've "bought" might just disappear if the service goes down. It might be worth it, but the best of both worlds would be nice.
I'm not sure what that should be, but unlimited local copies of everything for a small amount of money doesn't sound fair -- but Spotify hardly deserves a big cut of it either.
A pickle indeed, if only there were a service that was more of a co-op of artists. Happy to hear recommendations, I'm using soundcloud still.
- fabianhjr 6y agoIt already exists on both fronts: stream2own and a cooperative. https://resonate.is/ https://resonate.is/
- neltnerb 6y agoOh, I remember this. Gosh, I really wish it was good, and I mean that sincerely. It's just got such a limited selection and set of genres, and if what I want is a radio station to listen to in the background half the time... Don't get me wrong, the music is lovely. I like the idea a lot. It's just really not comparable =/
- fabianhjr 6y agoIt surely lacks RIAA-adjecent content; hopefully it gets better over time and improves the musicians' living conditions.
- richrichardsson 6y ago> might just disappear if the service goes down The service doesn't even need to go down, the licenses with Spotify can be revoked/expire/etc. I love the convenience of having an almost unlimited library of music to listen to, I absolutely detest the fact that one day I might think, "Oh I'd like to listen to <X> from my playlist." and suddenly it's no longer available, because <reasons>.