3 ms·
One issue with "getting paid for open source" is how much marginal value the project is generating. For example, take left-pad. At the time of its infamous remo
by chillee 6y ago
One issue with "getting paid for open source" is how much marginal value the project is generating. For example, take left-pad. At the time of its infamous removal, it was relied upon by thousands of packages, including Node and Babel.
But does that mean that it was worth millions of dollars? Of course not. Because if it wasn't available, anybody could have replicated it in a few hours of work.
I don't know if that's the case for this project, but just wanted to note that "being used by <multi billion dollar company>" does not necessarily mean that you're providing that much value.
- ClumsyPilot 6y agoBut if I am not providing much value, why am I wasting time on the project? Like even if I am willing to work for free, I select a project thats more valuable and meaningfull. So if open source is all free, its hard to tell what is meaningfull. Also maybe fundamentally important packages should be more carefull with their dependencies.