4 ms·

Well, it also probably compiles a full C++ program before running it. So performance would be terrible. I think this was made as tongue-in-cheek with all of the

by alttab 16y ago

Well, it also probably compiles a full C++ program before running it. So performance would be terrible. I think this was made as tongue-in-cheek with all of the ruby awk stuff we've seen lately. What I take out of this is "the unix command line tools are there, learn them and use them."

akaus 16y ago
Interactive performance? SCC compilation is about 1 sec on my old laptop with warm cache. Good enough for command line tool. Or do you mean run time performance? Run time probably faster than anything else.
- anon_d 16y ago
  [...] 1 sec [...]. Good enough for command line tool [...] lol
  - lvv 16y ago
    For interactive use - yes, it's good enough. For use in scripts - it's probably too slow. But you can use compiled binary. It is saved under /tmp/<user-name>-scc