3 ms·
Here's some more of their trenchant analysis: https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325148807546376193 https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325148807546
by zerocrates 6y ago
Here's some more of their trenchant analysis:
https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325148807546376193 https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1325148807546376193
They're showing results from Prince William County in Virginia to say, a-ha, a huge number of people voted for Biden but didn't vote at all for a downballot race: clearly a sign of fraud, irregularities, malfeasance, perhaps even skullduggery!
Except the image doesn't show the titles of those races: the second is obviously for President, and the first, with fewer votes, is... for the representative for the first Congressional district. There are three different Congressional districts that are partially within Prince William County.
These aren't nefarious, suspicious Biden-only votes, they're just showing one race that's on everybody's ballot and comparing it to another that isn't. The count of reporting precincts also seems to have been edited for the listing of Presidential votes: it shows 44 in the image instead of the actual number of 94.
You could chalk these things up to mistakes or misunderstandings, but judging by the content of the rest of this person's messaging I think it's pretty clear that assuming good faith isn't warranted here.
(edited to fix Twitter link... I think)