4 ms·

There's some real questions that should be answered, no matter how you lean. The following link was shared to me giving a quick summary of this: imgur.com/a/gx

There's some real questions that should be answered, no matter how you lean. The following link was shared to me giving a quick summary of this: imgur.com/a/gxuVAxc I mean if everything's fine then somebody should be able to explain why this isn't an issue, right? And there's also the infamous and mostly censored "4am vertical spikes": imgur.com/a/TwZqBQ7 I just want an explanation without being censored. These are reasonable questions to have answered, and until they are, I definitely have some doubt in what's being reported.

salawat 6y ago
You are not the only one. I'm curious as well. I always expect a few statistical oddities per election year, but there was a whole lot more than I usually recall hearing about this year.
- X3Xs4gF9oB 6y ago
  Here's a new paper from Walter Mebane (University of Michigan Political Science and Statistics) on inappropriate applications of Benford's Law to the 2020 election: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/inapB.pdf http://www-personal.umich.edu/~wmebane/inapB.pdf