It seems disingenuous to give a legitimate reason for an anomaly but then follow it with a claim that it’s fraud: > By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out

It seems disingenuous to give a legitimate reason for an anomaly but then follow it with a claim that it’s fraud: > By 4am the D to R ratio was all thrown out of whack. That is because these ballots were not sampled from the real Wisconsin voter population, and they were not randomized in the mail sorting system with the other ballots. They inherently have a different D to R signature... than the rest of the ballots quite possibly bc additional ballots were added to the batch, either through backdating or ballot manufacturing or software tampering. Do we know that mail in ballots are randomly shuffled in the mail? I know some states specifically pull aside ballots cast after certain dates, which could easily explain the differences in the graphs.