4 ms·
1. CineForm is lossy 2. This requires ~2x time and disk space, given that most end-user cameras record H.264/H.265 By the way, they chose to cripple it by mak
by tagrun 6y ago
1. CineForm is lossy
2. This requires ~2x time and disk space, given that most end-user cameras record H.264/H.265
By the way, they chose to cripple it by making these codecs premium-only features on Linux only: https://documents.blackmagicdesign.com/SupportNotes/DaVinci_Resolve_16_Supported_Codec_List.pdf https://documents.blackmagicdesign.com/SupportNotes/DaVinci_... Their excuse for not having H.264 is an outright lie, because Cisco has already paid the royalties for all binary users of OpenH264 on any OS. Furthermore, even if you buy their premium version, the only option to encode to H.264/H.265 on Linux is NVENC, which is inferior to CPU encoders and requires you to own an Nvidia card.
They're outright hostile toward Linux.