4 ms·
That still leaves too much room for interpretation (namely, quibbling over the definitions of "encrypt" or "end-to-end"). People have a right to encrypt their
by JoshTriplett 6y ago
That still leaves too much room for interpretation (namely, quibbling over the definitions of "encrypt" or "end-to-end").
People have a right to encrypt their communication, end-to-end with their intended participants, such that no one other than their intended participants can decrypt any aspect of their communication.
- feanaro 6y agoI agree. Your expanded definition is better. Now let's flesh it out into a full-fledged proposal, put it up on a website and disseminate it among the people. Let's get it into the parliaments as something that the parliament members have to discuss and finally either accept or reject. Let's give them a good fight.
- justinclift 6y ago> Let's give them a good fight. Possibly the wrong goal. How about "Let's win." instead? :)
- feanaro 6y agoYou're right. You can tell this topic makes my blood boil, unfortunately.
- JoshTriplett 6y agoI'm all for it, but I don't think posting it on a website is going to suffice. Get the EFF behind it, get others experienced with lobbying behind it, then it might get some momentum.