3 ms·
One of the main reasons why the project was abandoned was the immense difficulty of controlling it, especially in huge seas. I wonder if a similar vehicle woul
by qayxc 6y ago
One of the main reasons why the project was abandoned was the immense difficulty of controlling it, especially in huge seas.
I wonder if a similar vehicle would have advantages over conventional ferries and freighters today, given the advancements in electronics and assisted steering.
- dharmab 6y agoEkranoplans were high-maintenance, sucked corrosive saltwater into the engines, had huge turning radiuses and couldn't operate in rough waters. Mustard did a great video on why they failed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVdH_dYlVB8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVdH_dYlVB8
- kylegordon 6y agoTo be fair, the traditional ferries serving the West of Scotland can't handle rough waters either. It's a problem that plagues both designs.
- Animats 6y agoRight. All the problems of a large seaplane, and you never get enough altitude to get clear of high seas.
- duxup 6y agoGotta imagine the margin for error within a ground effect envelope is ULTRA thin. A plane loses a little altitude so what, catch a wave ... I can imagine that's not good.