3 ms·
>FWIW, I believe the newer syntax more closely resembles what you have with Cisco network equipment. What has to do the Cisco network equipment with Linux? >I
by pmarin 6y ago
>FWIW, I believe the newer syntax more closely resembles what you have with Cisco network equipment.
What has to do the Cisco network equipment with Linux?
>It also supports newer functionality like net namespaces, and uses newer kernel interfaces.
Why all the BSD’s do similar things without changing the user interface?
>None of those advantages are mentioned in the article that I can see...
Because he linked directly the Poettering’s article explaining all you said.
- jchw 6y ago>What has to do the Cisco network equipment with Linux? What must it have to do with Linux? It's industry-standard networking equipment. Is that not a decent enough reason to take inspiration? Network professionals already know Cisco. >Why All the BSD’s do similar things without changing the user interface? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Linux isn't a BSD, and it isn't run like one. The only positive thing I can say is, if you prefer the way *BSD is it remains a completely reasonable option in 2020. > Because he linked directly the Poettering’s article explaining all you said. And promptly disregarded all of it, which does not make matters any better for him to be honest.