5 ms·
> might start to drive legislative decisions in the same way that "car culture" did in the past decades. ...and that's been an unmitigated disaster on several
by tikhonj 6y ago
> might start to drive legislative decisions in the same way that "car culture" did in the past decades.
...and that's been an unmitigated disaster on several levels.
I like the idea of the internet being a utility more than personal car transportation being a utility but I can still see lots of ways for it to fall apart. Aggressive content controls? Mandated DRM for everyone? Strong restrictions on what kind of devices and software you can use? Crackdowns on encryption? All for your own good, of course...
- grishka 6y agoLooking at the way it's moving, it'd probably be the exact opposite. I would very much appreciate a ban on manufacturers having any technical means to control their devices after sale. You bought it, it's yours, period.
- edmundsauto 6y agoShould manufacturers have to support the modifications that people make?
- grishka 6y agoOf course not. If you modified your device, and if that broke it, you've voided your warranty, doesn't it already work this way?
- edmundsauto 6y agoWhat about cases where it's unclear whether the device is broken by the modification, or whether it broke under the modification? EG, early on in jailbreaking you could "brick" your phone - should Apple have responsibility to fix the device after that?
- grishka 6y agoIt does become clear at some point while diagnosing the problem, which is when they charge you money for the repair. But as someone who has literally never used their warranties... I can't relate.
- goatinaboat 6y agoand that's been an unmitigated disaster on several levels. Regulating Google as if it was the phone company (no pun intended), the postal service, or any utility however makes a lot of sense.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]