5 ms·
Because even in this case there's usually a court involved. The owner just doesn't show up on the 4th of the month and change the locks and take away your frid
by vsviridov 6y ago
Because even in this case there's usually a court involved.
The owner just doesn't show up on the 4th of the month and change the locks and take away your fridge and microwave...
- ashtonkem 6y agoFYI, while legally evictions are supposed to go through the courts, land lords regularly find illegal or quasi legal means to evict tenants quickly. This covers the range from negotiating with their tenants (which is fine), to finding process servers who are corrupt and make sure the tenants miss their court date, to simply removing the front door so that the tenants have no physical security and have to leave.
- dredmorbius 6y agoWhich are ... illegal.
- ashtonkem 6y agoYes, I did mention that.
- dredmorbius 6y agoThe practice described in TFA lacks even nominal protection of due process. The fact that where such protections do exist they are often still ignored ... does not make the original inequity any more fair. If your argument is attempting some other point, you might consider restating it more clearly, as I'm utterly failing to find anything but an implicit justification of Google's practice here.
- ashtonkem 6y agoI’m just stating what happens; all other arguments you’re mentioning are purely figments of your own imagination.
- dredmorbius 6y agoFigments guided by what you wrote and how it appears in context. Points you may wish to consider.