14 ms·
It would be censorship if the unaired part of the speech had more content. That was not the case.
by thomastjeffery 6y ago
It would be censorship if the unaired part of the speech had more content. That was not the case.
- sk5t 6y agoYes--it's not as if Donald set forth his case in a preamble, then bolstered that case with logic and evidence, brick by brick. He started with "there was massive fraud, big fraud" and ended with "I'm hearing there was so much fraud and cheating." But there was no evidence, only hand-waving and bluster.