5 ms·

It's great that you feel empowered and have been successful in this country. Lots of minorities haven't been, and for reasons outside of their control, based in

It's great that you feel empowered and have been successful in this country. Lots of minorities haven't been, and for reasons outside of their control, based in historical inequalities. The fundamental problem of the entitled right is that they can't imagine that other people have had different experiences than they have, and therefore attribute their disadvantaged state to "victim mentality."

AnHonestComment 6y ago
Telling minority individuals they don’t understand the experience of minorities and thinking you’re not a racist, lol. The left is insanely racist: just look at how Joe Biden said if you don’t vote for him, you’re a bad black — or that lady said the same to 50cent. I can’t even imagine being so racist you’d say that to someone, but hey — that’s who Democrats wanted for president.
nec4b 6y ago
The fundamental problem of the entitled left is unchecked imagination of other people experiences completely divorced from daily realities of those people. You have someone from a minority describing his experience to you and you feel the need to put him in his place immediately because there is an unknown number of people who have it worse. The entitled right at least donates a lot of money to charities (more than anybody else in the world) and helps a lot of people through various kinds of organizations. But hey if you say they can't image other people's experiences than it must be so.
- hackyhacky 6y ago
  Charity is not a substitute for social justice. My understanding of other people's experiences is not based on imagination. I've been there. I've seen it. Have you?
  - blub 6y ago
    Guilt tripping and emotional blackmail is not a path to social justice or any kind of justice. It's a dead end.
  - nec4b 6y ago
    "Charity is not a substitute for social justice." Of course it is not. Charity is real and it helps people right now where they need help the most. Social justice is a fantasy dreamed up in ivory towers. But only the left is compassionate, right? "I've been there. I've seen it." Where have you been and what have you seen to feel the need to put down experiences of those in minority who have succeeded in life? What have you as a member of the compassionate party done to help the poor people since charities aren't you thing? "Have you?" I have never ever once heard a migrant say: "I hope those nice social justice people succeed with their big ideas.". It was always: "Look what those nice people from the church down the road did for us.".
    - hackyhacky 6y ago
      How deluded do you have to be to think that I'm "puting down" his experiences, just by pointing out that he doesn't speak for everyone? I hear a lot of Americans saying "I really wish we had socialized health care" and "I wish that women made as much money as men did."
blub 6y ago
Poverty and suffering is not a left vs. right thing, it affects people all over the world. This doesn't mean that those people are morally superior to others who are e.g. rich or that they have the right to demand certain things from them. They can make their case just like everybody else and negotiate in good faith for a better position. If because of their situation they cannot do that, others typically do it for them. But you coming here and diminishing someone's experience, just because there's someone somewhere who isn't successful is merely an attempt emotional blackmail. This kind of emotional blackmail seems to work a lot better recently than in the past, but let's not confuse it with good arguments.
- hackyhacky 6y ago
  Would you say that the movement to abolish slavery was based on "emotional blackmail"? How about the movement for women's suffrage? No, I think that "emotional blackmail" is an attempt to color negatively any attempt at progress towards equality. I'm not diminishing anyone's experience. I'm just pointing out that he doesn't have the right to speak for everyone.
  - lawnchair_larry 6y ago
    You’re missing his point and contributing to the learned helplessness victimology problem by responding this way. Let me guess, you’re white?
    - deleted 6y ago
      [deleted]
hnuser123456 6y ago
Sure. And the fundamental problem of the entitled left is that they think they're standing up for minorities, but often speak over them, just like the right, while telling them it's for their own good, which is a dividing force just like the strawman right-winger in your head. They internalize so much racial shame that they casually walk straight away from being egalitarian, while claiming they never have.
- hackyhacky 6y ago
  You're reading an awful lot into people who you've apparently never spoken to. Do you think anyone who makes an attempt to help other people and improve equal treatment is motivated by "racial shame"? By your logic, we should have kept slavery and denied women the vote.
  - hnuser123456 6y ago
    I don't advocate for those things because I'm egalitarian. I don't think internalized shame is the only motivation for equality. I think we all are born with a little bit of universal empathy and we shouldn't be afraid to tap it. I've seen a lot of social justice that is motivated by the thrill of the attack more than simply achieving equality, and it easily falls away from the delicate balance they claimed to want at the start.

AnHonestComment 6y ago

Telling minority individuals they don’t understand the experience of minorities and thinking you’re not a racist, lol. The left is insanely racist: just look at how Joe Biden said if you don’t vote for him, you’re a bad black — or that lady said the same to 50cent. I can’t even imagine being so racist you’d say that to someone, but hey — that’s who Democrats wanted for president.

nec4b 6y ago

The fundamental problem of the entitled left is unchecked imagination of other people experiences completely divorced from daily realities of those people. You have someone from a minority describing his experience to you and you feel the need to put him in his place immediately because there is an unknown number of people who have it worse. The entitled right at least donates a lot of money to charities (more than anybody else in the world) and helps a lot of people through various kinds of organizations. But hey if you say they can't image other people's experiences than it must be so.

hackyhacky 6y ago
Charity is not a substitute for social justice. My understanding of other people's experiences is not based on imagination. I've been there. I've seen it. Have you?
- blub 6y ago
  Guilt tripping and emotional blackmail is not a path to social justice or any kind of justice. It's a dead end.
- nec4b 6y ago
  "Charity is not a substitute for social justice." Of course it is not. Charity is real and it helps people right now where they need help the most. Social justice is a fantasy dreamed up in ivory towers. But only the left is compassionate, right? "I've been there. I've seen it." Where have you been and what have you seen to feel the need to put down experiences of those in minority who have succeeded in life? What have you as a member of the compassionate party done to help the poor people since charities aren't you thing? "Have you?" I have never ever once heard a migrant say: "I hope those nice social justice people succeed with their big ideas.". It was always: "Look what those nice people from the church down the road did for us.".
  - hackyhacky 6y ago
    How deluded do you have to be to think that I'm "puting down" his experiences, just by pointing out that he doesn't speak for everyone? I hear a lot of Americans saying "I really wish we had socialized health care" and "I wish that women made as much money as men did."

blub 6y ago

Poverty and suffering is not a left vs. right thing, it affects people all over the world. This doesn't mean that those people are morally superior to others who are e.g. rich or that they have the right to demand certain things from them. They can make their case just like everybody else and negotiate in good faith for a better position. If because of their situation they cannot do that, others typically do it for them. But you coming here and diminishing someone's experience, just because there's someone somewhere who isn't successful is merely an attempt emotional blackmail. This kind of emotional blackmail seems to work a lot better recently than in the past, but let's not confuse it with good arguments.

hackyhacky 6y ago
Would you say that the movement to abolish slavery was based on "emotional blackmail"? How about the movement for women's suffrage? No, I think that "emotional blackmail" is an attempt to color negatively any attempt at progress towards equality. I'm not diminishing anyone's experience. I'm just pointing out that he doesn't have the right to speak for everyone.
- lawnchair_larry 6y ago
  You’re missing his point and contributing to the learned helplessness victimology problem by responding this way. Let me guess, you’re white?
  - deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]

hnuser123456 6y ago

Sure. And the fundamental problem of the entitled left is that they think they're standing up for minorities, but often speak over them, just like the right, while telling them it's for their own good, which is a dividing force just like the strawman right-winger in your head. They internalize so much racial shame that they casually walk straight away from being egalitarian, while claiming they never have.

hackyhacky 6y ago
You're reading an awful lot into people who you've apparently never spoken to. Do you think anyone who makes an attempt to help other people and improve equal treatment is motivated by "racial shame"? By your logic, we should have kept slavery and denied women the vote.
- hnuser123456 6y ago
  I don't advocate for those things because I'm egalitarian. I don't think internalized shame is the only motivation for equality. I think we all are born with a little bit of universal empathy and we shouldn't be afraid to tap it. I've seen a lot of social justice that is motivated by the thrill of the attack more than simply achieving equality, and it easily falls away from the delicate balance they claimed to want at the start.