3 ms·

So, the end result of that paper is a password-quality-meter like zxcvbn (or presumably better)? (They do reference zxcvbn in the paper: "One of the more accur

• vimax 6y ago
  If I read the paper correctly: They trained a state-of-the-art password guessing NN. They used this to train a second NN to estimate the number of guesses needed by the first NN to guess a given password, and used this second NN as the password meter. A password is resistant to online attacks if it takes more than 10^6 guesses, and resistant to offline if it takes more than 10^14 guesses. After comparing combinations of password requirements, blocklists, and strength requirements, they found that minimum of 12 characters, and a NN estimate of more than 10^12 guesses is the best password requirements for usability and protection from offline attacks. So instead of heuristics for a strong password, they derive the strengths from how many attempts it would take a SotA NN to guess the password.