4 ms·

Sorry, should have said 'were' rather than 'are'. I don't agree with your framing, but thinking about it more it probably would be fairer to say that both sides

Sorry, should have said 'were' rather than 'are'. I don't agree with your framing, but thinking about it more it probably would be fairer to say that both sides can't agree in this case, rather than that one side is obstructing.

arkis22 6y ago
I'm sorry but it would be most correct that one side refuses to go below a certain value and thats the value they've decided is worth it. And you know which side it is.
- tempestn 6y ago
  Logically wouldn't it be equivalent to say the other side refuses to go above a certain value?
  - arkis22 6y ago
    I can't afford a 25k used vehicle. I can afford a 15k used vehicle. lock me up tempstn. I'm clearly a fascist against the community. shame on me for not meeting your budget requirements!
    - tempestn 6y ago
      Sorry, this doesn't seem productive anymore, so I'm going to called it a night. I appreciate the perspective.
      - arkis22 6y ago
        yeah, when I describe it, it specifically really looks like shit doesn't it.