3 ms·
The two-party system is not a consequence of the lack of access to money. It is a consequence of the first-past-the-post system, which will always trend towards
by TheAsprngHacker 6y ago
The two-party system is not a consequence of the lack of access to money. It is a consequence of the first-past-the-post system, which will always trend towards two parties (as a matter of game theory). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger%27s_law.
The problem of primaries selecting for extremists could be partially alleviated with ranked-choice voting, so an extreme candidate with a significant minority of supporters can't win against a divided field of moderates. This is how Trump won the 2016 Republican nomination and how Sanders almost won the 2020 Democratic nomination before the establishment candidates dropped out and endorsed Biden. Or, we could try open primaries so independents can give input on the desired candidate.
- Someone 6y agoIndia has first past the post. Over 25 different parties got a seat in 2019 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Indian_general_election https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Indian_general_election) I think having political alliances (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_alliance https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_alliance) helps in that. Now, whether that’s a good idea is debatable. https://web.archive.org/web/20081220163843/http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12749771 https://web.archive.org/web/20081220163843/http://www.econom...: “Of the 522 members of India’s current parliament, 120 are facing criminal charges; around 40 of these are accused of serious crimes, including murder and rape. Most Indian politicians are presumed to be corrupt, which is less surprising. In India’s poor and fractious society patronage politics is inevitable“